|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
The Foot of the Continental Slope |
|||
The Foot of the Continental Slope
Paragraph 3 of article 76 states that
This means that if the boundary between the prolongation of the land mass
and the deep ocean floor, or the boundary between the rise and the deep
ocean floor can be identified directly, then that boundary will establish
the extent of the extended continental margin.
The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) Guidelines
(1999) declare a preference for identifying the foot of the continental
slope as the point of maximum change in sea floor gradient as the general
rule, with reliance on “evidence to the contrary” as exceptions to the
general rule. The Guidelines state that these exceptions can be applied when
the foot of the continental slope is not located reliably by the point of
maximum change in sea floor gradient, and that they provide an opportunity
for coastal States to use geological and geophysical evidence to locate the
foot of the continental slope. |
|||
|
A schematic diagram of a margin that is clearly divided into shelf, slope,
rise and abyssal plain Along morphologically complex margins, establishing the extent of natural prolongation of the land mass requires consideration of crustal structure, sediment deposition patterns, plate tectonic history, and other aspects of the evolution of the continental margin. Analysis of geophysical and geological data may, in some areas, help identify the region of the base of the continental slope where the maximum change of sea floor gradient rule can be applied, or show that the outer edge of the continental margin determined by this rule is not a reliable location of the extent of natural prolongation of the land mass. Areas where “evidence to the contrary” might be used to locate the foot of the continental slope are discussed in more detail later in this document. Finding the foot of the continental slope There are two steps to finding the foot of the continental slope 1. identify the region of the base of the continental slope 2. determine the location of the foot of the continental slope within that region. Identification of the region of the base of the continental slope may be on the basis of • morphological evidence • morphological evidence supported by geological and geophysical evidence • geological and geophysical evidence. The complexity of the margin and availability of data will dictate the choice of evidence to use. In areas where the morphology of the continental margin is clearly divided into slope, rise and abyssal plain, and there is no contradicting geological and geophysical evidence, identification of the region of the base of the continental slope and location of the point of maximum change in gradient within this region are based on morphological evidence and are relatively straightforward. For many reasons, along some margins the outer edge of the continental margin may not be reliably identified solely on the basis of morphological data. The CLCS Guidelines (6.3.10) state that along some margins the region of the base of the continental slope may be located within the continent-ocean transition zone. The location of the foot of the continental slope within that region can be determined by the maximum change in sea floor gradient rule, or, if this is inappropriate, by locating the inner edge of the continent-ocean transition. Maximum change in the gradient at the base of the continental slope In areas where the morphology of the continental margin can be clearly subdivided into shelf, slope, rise and abyssal plain, the region of the base of the continental slope is where the lower continental slope meets the rise, or where it meets the abyssal plain in cases where a rise is absent. The morphology of the seabed where the continental slope merges with the rise may be an abrupt boundary where gently-dipping rise sediments onlap a smooth, relatively steep slope, or it may be a complex transition where local relief on the ocean floor meets an irregular lower slope. Regional gradients can be used to narrow the search for the region of the base of the continental slope. Regional gradients less than 1 degree are generally considered representative of the rise and abyssal plain, and regional gradients greater than 2 degrees are generally considered representative of the slope. There are many exceptions to these values, however, and other evidence, such as the erosion effects of deep sea currents, underwater slides, margin collapse, local volcanic activity and deep-sea canyons, must be considered before finally establishing the region of the base of the continental slope. The width of the region of the base of the continental slope is typically 4 – 10 kilometres, but can vary according to the complexity of the margin. ![]() |
|||
| A schematic showing identification of the region of the base of the continental slope from the margin morphology | |||
|
Having established the region of the base of the continental slope,
the point of maximum change in gradient is determined by computing the
second derivative of the bathymetry within that region. The foot of the
continental slope has the maximum value of the second derivative of the
bathymetry.
|
|||
|
Evidence to the contrary and the Continent-Ocean Transition (COT) Analysis of geophysical and geological data can help identify the region of the base of the slope where the maximum change of sea floor gradient rule can be applied. If these data show that the maximum change of sea floor gradient rule does not reliably locate the edge of the continental margin within that region, then they might be used as “evidence to the contrary” in terms of article 76. Situations in which the maximum change in sea floor gradient rule might not reliably locate the foot of the continental slope include
For non-volcanic rifted and sheared continental margins, the CLCS Guidelines (6.3.10) state that
|
|||
|
The San Andreas Fault in California marks the boundary between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates. It passes out to sea in Bodega Bay north of San Francisco and the Gulf of California in the south. Because continental landmass is on both sides of the plate boundary the fault does not disrupt continental prolongation. (photo from NASA).
Geological and geophysical supporting evidence |
|||
![]() A schematic showing the use of geological and geophysical data as supporting evidence to distinguish the region of the base of the continental slope and use of the maximum change in gradient rule to identify the foot of the continental slope |
|||
|
The region of the Western Lau Terrace, north of New Zealand is
an example of the use of geological and geophysical evidence to identify
the region of the base of the continental slope. This part of the New
Zealand continental margin is characterised by terraces and
sediment-filled basins formed by tilted basement blocks that step down
to the deep ocean floor of the South Fiji Basin. The COT lies at the
western edge of the Western Lau Terrace. On these profiles the foot of
the continental slope is the point with the maximum change in sea floor
gradient within the transition zone. |
|||
![]() |
|||
|
Seismic sections and a location map (looking south) of the Lau Terrace
and Western Lau Terrace. Basement fault blocks are shown by red dashed
lines Evidence to the contrary |
|||
|
A schematic diagram of a rifted continental margin where geological and
geophysical evidence might establish the COT. The CLCS Guidelines state
that the landward limit of the transition zone may be used as the foot
of the continental slope from which the outer limit of the continental
shelf can be established by the formulae of article 76 paragraph 4(a) Hikurangi Plateau – evidence to the contrary The Hikurangi Plateau, east of New Zealand, is a large igneous province that sutured to the New Zealand continent in the Cretaceous and now forms the base of much of the continent. It is an example of a continental margin where geological and geophysical evidence may be used to establish the natural prolongation of the landmass and the foot of the continental slope. Seismic lines across the northern margin of the Chatham Rise and the Hikurangi Plateau show a prominent break in the bathymetric slope along the base of the Chatham Rise. These seismic data, along with gravity models, show that this break does not correspond to the extent of the natural prolongation of the landmass, and therefore is not the foot of the continental slope. The plateau extends up to 700 kilometres north of the Chatham Rise. The northeastern boundary of the plateau changes along strike from a one kilometre high seafloor escarpment in the west (profile A below) to a buried one kilometre high escarpment in the east (profiles B and C below). The foot of the continental slope is located at the point of the maximum change in seafloor gradient on profile A. On profiles B and C the foot of the continental slope is located at the inner edge of the COT between the Hikurangi Plateau and ocean crust of the Pacific Basin. This boundary is near the outer limit of the natural prolongation of the land mass, about 100 km beyond the point of maximum change in seafloor gradient on profile C. |
|||
+ |
|||
| Seismic sections and location diagram (looking to the southwest) over the Chatham Rise and Hikurangi Plateau. The seismic profiles show basement (pink) and seabed (yellow line). A close-up of profile C at the bottom of the figure shows a maximum change in seafloor gradient at the southern profile limit and an interpretation of the continent-ocean transition at northern edge of the plateau |